DUNDi Not Able to Handle ComplexFailoverSituations
- From: "Douglas Garstang" <dgarstang (at) oneeighty.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:04:34 -0600
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas Garstang
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:51 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle
> ComplexFailoverSituations
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Davies [mailto:stephen.l.davies (at) gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:41 AM
> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle
> > ComplexFailoverSituations
> >
> >
> > On 15/06/06, Douglas Garstang <dgarstang (at) oneeighty.com> wrote:
> > > Who said I was a C programmer?
> >
> > Speaking for myself, I just assumed that you understood that the
> > behaviour of an open-source application was the result of
> contributed
> > code. Your message read to me like something of a demand that
> > "someone" fixed it. You are probably trying to do something pretty
I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk 'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider distributed ACD queues to be a requirement for an enterprise grade product, but it's becoming apparent that there is no mechanism for implementing this. I'm being told that DUNDi isn't the right man for the job.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users