| By Date: | <-- --> |
| By Thread: | <-- --> |
Hi Rodney:
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 08:17 -0500, Chuming Chen wrote:
[...]
It took about 17 seconds per sequence when I run 721 sequences (542K) against 22G database.
But when I run 88532 sequences (47M) against the same database, it took about 1 minute.
Can the performance be improved if the query sequence is in a relatively smaller size?
Thank you for your kind comments and suggestions.
[...]
On some level, I have to tell my students that we need to place this in
perspective and consider that that you ran 88,532 sequences against a
22G database and it _ONLY_ took you about a minute.
it, you could possibly get run 42,495,360 sequences in an average work day and 212,476,800 in an average work week and somewhere in the neighborhood of 11,048,793,600 for a given year. Not bad for some small perl code some data mining.
-- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman (at) scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615 _______________________________________________ Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters (at) bioinformatics.org https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters