linux_set_kernel_oplock: Refused oplock on file. F_SETLEASE semantic problem ?
- From: Jeremy Allison <jra (at) samba.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:13:42 -0700
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:09:31PM +0200, Cedric Delfosse wrote:
>
> I'm answering to myself. My problems are fixed:
> - kernel oplocks = No has fixed the violation error for some
> applications. Why the oplocks are refused is unknown, but for now I
> don't need them ;
Yes, that would definately fix any kernel oplock problems (turning
them off).
> - there is only one application (a CAO drawing tool) for which only
> some files causes a violation error, even with kernel oplocks = No.
> Looks like there was an interaction with the SAMBA-VSCAN module (version
> 0.3.6b) somewhere, as disabling this module removed the violation error.
Interesting. If that the latest version of vscan ?
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba