sipXconfig maven2 based build

[Guy Hulbert <gwhulbert (at) eol.ca>]

On Fri, 2006-03-02 at 08:50 -0500, Damian Krzeminski wrote:
> Guy Hulbert wrote:
<snip>
> >> - Debian ITP has been deleted because of inactivity for more than 600 days
> >>   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=188782
> >>   http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/maven.html
> >>
> > 
> > Hmmm... this second page is very enlightening.
> > 
> 
> It's probably maven1. If anyone claims that maven2 has any dependencies 
> beyond java, they are seriously misguided. It would be like saying that 
> rpm tool has dependency on each and every package that you have built 
> rpm for.
> 
> > Maven looks like JBoss x 10 (considering dependencies).
> > 
> > It is a tool for "developers".
> 
> of course it is, even for those of us who did not earn their apostrophes yet

I am just a humble "packager" ... I have a slave C++/Java coder :-)

> 
> > 
> > IIRC, that there is now a Soap interface for the sipXconfig.
> > 
> > What would make sense to me, is to completely split off the java part of
> > the SipXconfig and have it communicate with the C++ application purely
> > via Soap (perhaps this already exists or is planned).
> 
> http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XCF-904
> 
> I am all for separating sipXconfig from the rest of the system. There is 
> a lot of PBX independent goodies in it. Both PBX and sipXconfig can 
> benefit from better defined interfaces. sipXconfig has also vastly 
> shorter development/test cycle - that's why you guys are bombarded with 
> Douglas's "we reached a milestone" e-mails.
> 
> > 
> > This would allow the possibility of writing simple config applications
> > in more GNU-friendly languages such as python or ruby.
> > 
> 
> Sure - but please note that SOAP is now implemented by sipXconfig. In 

I looked at XCF-904, which states

	"simply as a way to offload cpu utilization"

How does sipXconfig talk to the rest of the app if it is the only piece
which does SOAP ?

I had the impression that the in-memory database maintains state in .xml
files which are configured remotely using SOAP.

If you're trying to offload CPU resources, then how does the data get to
the rest of the app ?

Or do you have a Java piece which talks to a C++ piece via SOAP so you
don't have to run Java on the boxes where you are saving CPU cycles ?

> Java. If you want ruby/python only solution you have to deal directly 
> with sipXpbx. No SOAP there.
> 
> > --gh
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> sipx-dev (at) list.sipfoundry.org
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
> 
-- 
Guy Hulbert
gwhulbert (at) eol.ca (preferred)
work: (416) 391-2051 (no voicemail)
cell: (416) 738-6257 (voicemail)


_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
sipx-dev (at) list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev