remote APIs
- From: Ray Johnson <ray.johnson (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:18:38 -0800
SOAP is actually pretty simple. The statement that it is hard seems kind of funny from folks working on an IP based PBX. :)
(Not being critical - I'm sure there were constraints and dependancies in the code base that made it difficult to make a switch to SOAP. Just thought it was funny say it was the complexity of SOAP that made it hard to do...)
On 2/3/06, Walter Gillett <wgillett (at) pingtel.com> wrote:
SOAP did evolve as an enhanced version of XML-RPC, but it hasn't
completely replaced XML-RPC. SOAP is powerful, interoperable,
extensible, and well-standardized via W3C, but it's also extremely
complex and has a high overhead for the developer. XML-RPC still has a
role when the goal is to do something lightweight and simple.
-Walter
Guy Hulbert wrote:
>I thought SOAP evolved as a replacement for XMLRPC ...
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
sipx-dev (at) list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
sipx-dev (at) list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
- Follow-Ups:
- remote APIs
- From: Walter Gillett <wgillett (at) pingtel.com>