By Date: <-- -->
By Thread: <-- -->

bttv msp3400 2.6.15.6 - > 2.6.16 stereo stop working

On Sunday 26 March 2006 16:33, Daniel Smolik wrote:
> Hans Verkuil napsal(a):
> > On Sunday 26 March 2006 15:04, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> >>Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>>Is this log all you get when running xawtv in 2.6.15? Can you make
> >>>another log, this time starting xawtv, select a stereo channel and
> >>>wait 30 seconds, then select LANG1 as audio mode, wait another 30
> >>>seconds, then go back to stereo and wait another 30 seconds before
> >>>closing down. Can you mail me (off-list) the log from the
> >>>/var/log/messages file as that includes timestamps. Please also
> >>> run the same procedure again for 2.6.16.
> >>
> >>Are you sure you really want to compare it to 2.6.15? I'm sure you
> >>know (as you've fixed it) that this one has completely and utterly
> >>broken stereo / multilanguage selection due to the whacky
> >>best_video_sound function - if you select stereo you get mono, if
> >> you select lang1 or lang2 you get stereo and so on. Doesn't work
> >> at all. I think for me it worked correctly last time with 2.6.13
> >> (not sure, might have been 2.6.12). Either 2.6.13 or 14 introduced
> >> the bogus reporting of the detected mono/stereo/multilang sound
> >> (so xawtv got its initial setting wrong, which could be fixed by
> >> manually setting the desired audio setting), whereas as said
> >> 2.6.15 broke it completely. For 2.6.16, xawtv also reports always
> >> mono for me (on a msp3400c). I can switch to lang1/lang2 at least
> >> without getting mixed languages...
> >
> > What I want to know is why the behavior is different for the
> > msp3400c. I've tested the msp3400d and g versions and they work
> > fine. Without a msp3400c I cannot test it and I did the best I
> > could. As you say, it was all horribly broken, and everything
> > should be fully functioning again in 2.6.17. Also, the language
> > handling is by definition broken in the poor v4l1 implementation.
> > Full fledged support is only possible in v4l2. But that's another
> > story.
> >
> > I'd really appreciate it if you or Daniel could test with the
> > latest v4l-dvb repository from www.linuxtv.org to see if it is
> > working in there (and thus in 2.6.17).
>
> Yes I download this  hg-v4l-dvb-110e8e48f80b.tar.bz2 I am no familiar
> with mercurial. Is it right file for testing ?

Yes, that's fine. I hope this works.

	Hans

--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request (at) redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list