RFC: MPEG encoding and decoding V4L2 API additions

["Manu Abraham" <abraham.manu (at) gmail.com>]

On 2/17/07, hermann pitton <hermann-pitton (at) arcor.de> wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 17.02.2007, 02:58 +0400 schrieb Manu Abraham:
> > On 2/17/07, hermann pitton <hermann-pitton (at) arcor.de> wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, den 16.02.2007, 22:51 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Am Freitag, den 16.02.2007, 19:55 +0400 schrieb Manu Abraham:
> > > > > On 2/16/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab (at) infradead.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > API 's are meant to be hardware independant. Probably rjkm has cleared
> > > > > the rest of your doubts.
> > >
> > > Ah, I forgot to add. There are enough examples of APIs claiming
> > > something as a feature, which is simply a bug.
> >
> > Can you please cite a few ?
>
> bttv radio.

I just reassert my statement ..

"If API's are made out of datasheets, that's what happens (becomes
hardware dependant)"

forgot to add one line, earlier. In the long run.. useless .. But
device datasheets can be used to verify the API, not the other way
round (The reverse method usually happens due to lack of
understanding)


Manu

--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request (at) redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list