RFC: MPEG encoding and decoding V4L2 API additions
- From: hermann pitton <hermann-pitton (at) arcor.de>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:48:26 +0100
Am Sonntag, den 18.02.2007, 17:52 +0400 schrieb Manu Abraham:
> On 2/18/07, hermann pitton <hermann-pitton (at) arcor.de> wrote:
>
> >
> > Manu,
> >
> > don't post me "private notes" which such citations ( ) I never asked
> > for.
> >
>
> Who started the private threads. Anyway, not interested in the answer
> also. Since this is just "nonsense"
Oh my, there is really a problem.
How can you compare a 60K diff of different mantis drivers around,
posted out of list cause of its size, with some old IRC quotes with so
many f*, a* and others that it will never pass the filters and I got
sick of it after it had good arguments in the beginning?
Much better than not to talk at all.
I don't know how to settle this easy, but I'm not against people
developing drivers under NDAs for getting some income and can understand
that it is not convenient after lots of work to have the v4l maintainer
suddenly around.
On the other hand the maintainer is _forced_ by all others to collect as
much information, datasheets, contacts as possible, else he would be
asked "what, you did not even try?".
Guess the best is still to try to talk with each other.
Hermann
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request (at) redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list